We build for the people working outside
Trackrr started from a simple observation: the moment work leaves the office, most companies lose the ability to know what happened. We build the smallest tool that fixes that.
The problem we kept running into
Service businesses in India run on field staff — technicians, guards, housekeepers, engineers, representatives. Their work happens on somebody else’s premises, which means the two most basic management questions become surprisingly hard: did they go, and how long were they there?
The existing answers are all unsatisfying. A paper register at each client site proves nothing and arrives at payroll as a photograph. A biometric device is fixed to a wall, which is the one place the work is not happening. A WhatsApp group produces a stream of messages nobody can audit three months later when a client disputes an invoice.
So most companies do the reasonable thing and trust their people, then absorb the cost of the small percentage who take advantage of it — and, more expensively, lose every dispute with a client because they have no evidence.
What we decided to build
Trackrr records three things at the moment work starts: who (a live selfie), where (GPS coordinates), and when (a server-side timestamp). It repeats that at check-out. That is the whole idea, and almost everything else in the product is reporting on top of it.
The constraint we held ourselves to was that a field employee should need no training. If a technician cannot use it correctly on their first day without being taught, we have failed, regardless of how good the dashboard is.
Where we draw the line
There is a version of this product that tracks people continuously through the day, and it would be easy to build. We do not build it, and we turn down the requests. Verification of agreed work at an agreed place is a fair thing to ask of an employee. Watching them between jobs is not, and in our experience it also destroys adoption — a team that feels surveilled finds ways around the tool within a month.
Three things that shape the product
Proof over promises
Every feature we build has to answer one question: does this make it easier to know what actually happened? If it only makes a dashboard look busier, it does not ship.
The field comes first
Our users are standing in the sun with one hand free. The app is one screen and one button because anything more gets abandoned in week two.
Verification, not surveillance
We record what is needed to prove a visit and deliberately nothing more. No background tracking, no route traces, no silent capture.
Want to talk to the people building it?
We do our own demos. You will speak to someone who can answer a product question properly rather than take it away.